PRISMA 2020

P Tugwell, D Tovey - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021 - Elsevier
A revision of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
(PRISMA) statement is an important event. The PRISMA 2020 statement has, like its …

The systematic review toolbox

C Marshall, A Sutton, H O'Keefe… - SR Tool Box. URL: http …, 2021 - researchgate.net
Systematic Review (SR) Toolbox is a community-driven, searchable, web-based catalogue
of tools to support the systematic review process. The resource aims to help reviewers find …

An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview

H Hunt, A Pollock, P Campbell, L Estcourt, G Brunton - Systematic reviews, 2018 - Springer
Background Overviews of systematic reviews are a relatively new approach to synthesising
evidence, and research methods and associated guidance are developing. Within this paper …

Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis

AA Veroniki, S Tsokani, S Zevgiti, I Pagkalidou… - Systematic …, 2021 - Springer
Abstract Background The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis (NMA) published in 2015 …

A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017

T Rombey, K Allers, T Mathes, F Hoffmann… - Bmc medical research …, 2019 - Springer
Background An a priori design is essential to reduce the risk of bias in systematic reviews
(SRs). To this end, authors can register their SR with PROSPERO, and/or publish a SR …

Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic …

S de Kock, L Stirk, J Ross, S Duffy, C Noake… - International Journal of …, 2021 - cambridge.org
ObjectivesTo evaluate the methodological and reporting characteristics of search methods
of systematic reviews (SRs) using the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta …

Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior …

K Maticic, M Krnic Martinic, L Puljak - Bmc medical research methodology, 2019 - Springer
Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews'(SRs) abstracts is important because
this is often the only information about a study that readers have. The aim of this study was to …

From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews

C Breuer, JJ Meerpohl, W Siemens - Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und …, 2023 - Elsevier
Systematic reviews (SRs) have become a central tool for evidence-based health care over
the last 30 years. The number of SRs being published has increased steadily. However …

Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability

N Shaheen, A Shaheen, A Ramadan… - Frontiers in research …, 2023 - frontiersin.org
Systematic reviews play a crucial role in evidence-based practices as they consolidate
research findings to inform decision-making. However, it is essential to assess the quality of …

The “realist search”: a systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting

A Booth, S Briscoe, JM Wright - Research synthesis methods, 2020 - Wiley Online Library
The requirement for literature searches that identify studies for inclusion in systematic
reviews should be systematic, explicit, and reproducible extends, at least by implication, to …