… forms part of the case for judicial deference and humility. See, eg, Chevron USA Inc. v. …
idea's core appeal: Under the right circumstances, the reasoned explanation requirement can be …

… , for justification than for action reasoning, and there are … a much-needed measure of
ethical reasoning among junior … Overall, it is similarity rather than difference by gender that is …

… Consequently, a deference model, outlined within a credence-based framework, does a
better job of capturing the relevant phenomena, and explaining how we should update our …

… for laws to violate them—reversing the direction of the difference between conditions. In
sum, this preliminary evidence reveals an apparent contradiction: that laws need to observe …

… determine the gender difference in each dimension. Another independent sample t-test was
performed five times to determine whether there was a difference depending on participants’ …

… Given that we observe evidence for the opposite effect, the timing difference is less of a
concern. However, irregularities in the transformed course pretest results, specifically in the …

… values to be above 0.3 (representing the difference in CTT difficulty between the top and …
a measure of reliability: a value of at least 0.7 indicates that the test is reliable for measuring …

… Part II illustrates why this jurisprudence is wrong under Anderson-Burdick and explains how
it devalues the right to vote, the most fundamental right in our democracy. Deference to state …

… in terms of the underlying adjudicatory framework. Neither the proportionality framework
that prevails internationally nor the strict scrutiny framework prominent in the United States …

… either measure legal reasoning capabilities that are practically useful, or measure reasoning
… show how popular legal frameworks for describing legal reasoning—which distinguish …