Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - Journal of clinical …, 2012 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared
with studies on inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To …

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - Journal of Clinical …, 2012 - infona.pl
Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared with studies on
inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To appraise the reliability …

[引用][C] Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - Journal of Clinical …, 2012 - researchportal.helsinki.fi
Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals
— University of Helsinki Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content University of …

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals.

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - Journal of Clinical …, 2011 - europepmc.org
Objective Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared with
studies on inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To appraise the …

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - Journal of Clinical …, 2012 - search.proquest.com
Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared with studies on
inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To appraise the reliability …

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - JOURNAL OF …, 2012 - researchportal.tuni.fi
Objective: Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared with
studies on inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To appraise the …

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen, A Auvinen… - Journal of Clinical …, 2012 - jclinepi.com
Objective Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared with
studies on inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To appraise the …

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M Fogelholm, S Leppinen… - Journal of clinical …, 2012 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Objective Peer review is the gold standard for evaluating scientific quality. Compared with
studies on inter-reviewer variability, research on panel evaluation is scarce. To appraise the …

[引用][C] Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M FOGELHOLM, S LEPPINEN… - Journal of clinical …, 2012 - pascal-francis.inist.fr
Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant
proposals CNRS Inist Pascal-Francis CNRS Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases …

[引用][C] Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

M FOGELHOLM, S LEPPINEN, A AUVINEN… - Journal of clinical …, 2012 - Elsevier