Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - Elsevier
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: a substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe… - Journal of …, 2011 - researchdirect.westernsydney.edu …
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases-particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases-particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - Elsevier
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
[DOC][DOC] Gender Differences in Peer Reviews of Grant Applications: A Substantive-Methodological Synergy in Support of the Null Hypothesis Model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - researchgate.net
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - infona.pl
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
[PDF][PDF] Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - academia.edu
abstract Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in
academia, but is widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to …
academia, but is widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
H Marsh, U Jayasinghe, N Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - ora.ox.ac.uk
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases-particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases-particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe… - Journal of …, 2011 - acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - ideas.repec.org
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe… - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - econpapers.repec.org
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …