Development and validation of a novel diagnostic nomogram to differentiate between intestinal tuberculosis and crohn's disease: a 6-year prospective multicenter …

Y He, Z Zhu, Y Chen, F Chen, Y Wang… - Official journal of the …, 2019 - journals.lww.com
Y He, Z Zhu, Y Chen, F Chen, Y Wang, C Ouyang, H Yang, M Huang, X Zhuang, R Mao
Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG, 2019journals.lww.com
OBJECTIVES: Differentiating Crohn's disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) remains
a diagnostic challenge. Misdiagnosis carries potential grave implications. We aimed to
develop and validate a novel diagnostic nomogram for differentiating them. METHODS: In
total, 310 eligible patients were recruited from 6 tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centers.
Among them, 212 consecutive patients (143 CD and 69 ITB) were used in the derivation
cohort for the establishment of diagnostic equation and nomogram; 7 investigative …
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Differentiating Crohn's disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) remains a diagnostic challenge. Misdiagnosis carries potential grave implications. We aimed to develop and validate a novel diagnostic nomogram for differentiating them.
METHODS:
In total, 310 eligible patients were recruited from 6 tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centers. Among them, 212 consecutive patients (143 CD and 69 ITB) were used in the derivation cohort for the establishment of diagnostic equation and nomogram; 7 investigative modalities including clinical manifestations, laboratory results, endoscopic findings, computed tomography enterography features, and histology results were used to derive the diagnostic model and nomogram. Ninety-eight consecutive patients (76 CD and 22 ITB) were included for validation of the diagnostic model.
RESULTS:
Eight out of total 79 parameters were identified as valuable parameters used for establishing diagnostic equations. Two regression models were built based on 7 differential variables: age, transverse ulcer, rectum involvement, skipped involvement of the small bowel, target sign, comb sign, and interferon-gamma release assays (for model 1) or purified protein derivative (for model 2), respectively. Accordingly, 2 nomograms of the above 2 models were developed for clinical practical use, respectively. Further validation test verified the efficacy of the nomogram 1 with 90.9% specificity, 86.8% sensitivity, 97.1% PPV, 66.7% negative predictive value (NPV), and 87.8% accuracy for identifying CD, and the efficacy of the nomogram 2 with 100% specificity, 84.2% sensitivity, 100% positive predictive value, 64.7% NPV, and 87.8% accuracy for diagnosing CD.
CONCLUSIONS:
The derivation and validation cohorts identified and validated 2 highly accurate and practical diagnostic nomograms for differentiating CD from ITB. These diagnostic nomograms can be conveniently used to identify some difficult CD or ITB cases, allowing for decision-making in a clinical setting.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果