[HTML][HTML] 3D bioelectronic interface: Capturing circulating tumor cells onto conducting polymer-based micro/nanorod arrays with chemical and topographical control

YS Hsiao, SC Luo, S Hou, B Zhu, J Sekine… - Small (Weinheim an …, 2014 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
YS Hsiao, SC Luo, S Hou, B Zhu, J Sekine, CW Kuo, DY Chueh, H Yu, HR Tseng, P Chen
Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2014ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Chemical and physical control of biointerfaces is attractive because of its flexibility and
effectiveness in cell and tissue regulation, as well as in diagnostic and therapeutic
applications.[1–7] When introducing biochemical cues to cells, various cell activities (eg,
adhesion, spreading morphologies, proliferation) can be manipulated at their
biointerfaces.[5–7] For example, in the development of stem cell therapies, surfaces
modified with synthetic peptides can be used to support the self-renewal and differentiation …
Chemical and physical control of biointerfaces is attractive because of its flexibility and effectiveness in cell and tissue regulation, as well as in diagnostic and therapeutic applications.[1–7] When introducing biochemical cues to cells, various cell activities (eg, adhesion, spreading morphologies, proliferation) can be manipulated at their biointerfaces.[5–7] For example, in the development of stem cell therapies, surfaces modified with synthetic peptides can be used to support the self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells.[4] Notably, specific cell–substrate interactions observed on three-dimensional (3D) micro/nanostructures can provide the topographic cues regulating the cell spreading morphology of neurons,[8, 9] thereby promoting the level of cell differentiation for stem cells,[10–12] enhancing the transfection efficiency of cells with targeted gene expression,[13–15] and improving the capturing efficiency of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for noninvasive blood biopsies.[16–21] In addition to these biological applications, integrating additional electrical functionality into biointerfaces has recently attracted significant interest for the digital transformation of biological signals within bioelectronics.[22, 23]
Bioelectronic interfaces (BEIs) are promising intermediate layers that can enhance communication between electronics and biological systems; they can be operated to couple the flows of electrons and ions in dual directions. Accordingly, BEIs have great potential for use in electrical signaling,[22, 23] stimulation,[24–28] and electrically triggered-response toward the release and pumping of small molecules.[29–33] In the development of BEIs, organic conducting polymers [CPs; eg, polypyrrole or poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)(PEDOT)] have been applied widely for their outstanding electrical transport properties, inherent biocompatibility, and high manufacturing flexibility. Indeed, CPs can be synthesized with a diverse array of chemical designs, such as the incorporation of various anionic dopants [eg, poly (sodium styrene sulfonate)(PSS), tosylate (TOS)][34–36] and/or the presenting of various functional side chains,[20, 37–39] thereby extending their applicability. For instance, TOS-doped PEDOT (PEDOT: TOS) materials are currently the most promising BEIs because of their high electrical stability and biocompatibility, allowing long-term cell culturing or implantation;[36] alternatively, carboxylic acid–grafted PEDOT (PEDOTAc) materials can be conjugated to a specific cell capturing agent for CTC assays.[20] Briefly, this bioconjugation process involves initial activation of the carboxylic acid groups, using N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), and subsequent conjugation with streptavidin. The streptavidin-grafted PEDOT films are then incubated with biotinylated anti-EpCAM to
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果