A 2-center comparative study on tonic versus burst spinal cord stimulation: amount of responders and amount of pain suppression

D De Ridder, MWPM Lenders, CC De Vos… - The Clinical journal …, 2015 - journals.lww.com
Results: Overall burst stimulation was significantly better than tonic stimulation and baseline.
On average the pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) improved from 7.8 at baseline to 4.9 with
tonic to 3.2 with burst stimulation. For the Belgian and Dutch centers combined, 62.5% of
nonresponders to tonic stimulation did respond to burst stimulation, on average, with 43%
pain suppression. Most responders to tonic further improved with burst stimulation; on
average, pain suppression improved from 50.6% to 73.6. 3%. The results (from both centers) …

[PDF][PDF] A 2-center Comparative Study on Tonic Versus Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation

MD Dirk De Ridder, MWPM Lenders, CC De Vos… - Clin J Pain, 2015 - academia.edu
Results: Overall burst stimulation was significantly better than tonic stimulation and baseline.
On average the pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) improved from 7.8 at baseline to 4.9 with
tonic to 3.2 with burst stimulation. For the Belgian and Dutch centers combined, 62.5% of
nonresponders to tonic stimulation did respond to burst stimulation, on average, with 43%
pain suppression. Most responders to tonic further improved with burst stimulation; on
average, pain suppression improved from 50.6% to 73.6. 3%. The results (from both centers) …
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果