A new chronological and technological synthesis for Late Middle Paleolithic of the Eastern Cantabrian Region

J Rios-Garaizar - Quaternary International, 2017 - Elsevier
Quaternary International, 2017Elsevier
This paper explores the nature of the variability noted in the Late Middle Paleolithic lithic
technology of the Eastern Cantabrian Region. The sequence at Axlor exemplifies this
variability revealing important changes in technology from ca. 55–45 ka BP. A major shift
from stable occupations with a Levallois-based technology to shorter occupations with a
Quina-based technology is observed. The critical analysis of the available information for the
Middle Paleolithic assemblages in the region reveals six major phases: an Early Middle …
Abstract
This paper explores the nature of the variability noted in the Late Middle Paleolithic lithic technology of the Eastern Cantabrian Region. The sequence at Axlor exemplifies this variability revealing important changes in technology from ca. 55–45 ka BP. A major shift from stable occupations with a Levallois-based technology to shorter occupations with a Quina-based technology is observed. The critical analysis of the available information for the Middle Paleolithic assemblages in the region reveals six major phases: an Early Middle Paleolithic (170–100 ka BP), an undefined Middle Paleolithic (90–60 ka BP), a Vasconian (Discoid technology with cleavers – 60–50 ka BP), a Levallois Mousterian (55–50 ka BP), a Quina Mousterian (50–45 ka BP) and a Late Mousterian (45–40 ka BP). Although the Levallois and Quina Mousterian phases seem to be adaptations to the rapid environmental changes happening during the first phases of MIS3 (between DO16–17 and DO12), there are other factors that also influenced the configuration of these different technological systems, such as the modification of settlement systems or changes in Neanderthal group organization, and the resulting transformation of social needs.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果