A randomized controlled trial of cold-adapted and inactivated vaccines for the prevention of influenza A disease

KM Edwards, WD Dupont, MK Westrich… - Journal of Infectious …, 1994 - academic.oup.com
KM Edwards, WD Dupont, MK Westrich, WD Plummer Jr, PS Palmer, PF Wright
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994academic.oup.com
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial over 5 years compared the safety,
immunogenicity, and efficacy of cold-adapted and inactivated influenza A vaccines in 5210
normal subjects. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Inactivated vaccine significantly
increased hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers. Significant titer rises were also noted
after cold-adapted vaccine but of lesser magnitude than with inactivated vaccine. The
efficacyof inactivated vaccine in preventing culture-positive influenza was 76%(95 …
Abstract
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial over 5 years compared the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of cold-adapted and inactivated influenza A vaccines in 5210 normal subjects. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Inactivated vaccine significantly increased hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers. Significant titer rises were also noted after cold-adapted vaccine but of lesser magnitude than with inactivated vaccine. The efficacyof inactivated vaccine in preventing culture-positive influenza was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%–87%) for HINI disease and 74% (95% CI, 52%–86%) for H3N2; for cold-adapted vaccine, 85% (95% CI, 70%–92%) and 58% (95% CI, 29%–75%), respectively. The efficacy of inactivated vaccine in preventing a four-fold rise in antibody titer over the influenza season was 69% (95% CI, 61%–76%) for H1N1 and 73% (95% CI, 65%–79%) for H3N2; for cold-adapted vaccine, 54% (95% CI, 44%–62%) and 32% (95% CI, 17%–44%), respectively. Cold-adapted and inactivated influenza vaccines are safe and effective for preventing influenza A disease.
Oxford University Press
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

Google学术搜索按钮

example.edu/paper.pdf
搜索
获取 PDF 文件
引用
References