Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector–a rapid evidence review

GAA Garavito, T Moniz, C Mansilla, S Iqbal… - BMC Health Services …, 2024 - Springer
GAA Garavito, T Moniz, C Mansilla, S Iqbal, R Dobrogowska, F Bennin, S Talwar, AF Khalid
BMC Health Services Research, 2024Springer
Background Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster
international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are
instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making
processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy
and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most
effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of …
Background
Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.
Methods
The review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.
Results
The review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.
Conclusions
Evidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果