Amperometric sensor for nitrite using a glassy carbon electrode modified with alternating layers of iron (III) tetra-(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)-porphyrin and cobalt (II) …

WJR Santos, AL Sousa, RCS Luz, FS Damos… - Talanta, 2006 - Elsevier
WJR Santos, AL Sousa, RCS Luz, FS Damos, LT Kubota, AA Tanaka, SMCN Tanaka
Talanta, 2006Elsevier
The development of a highly sensitive amperometric sensor for nitrite using a glassy carbon
electrode modified with alternated layers of iron (III) tetra-(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)-porphyrin
(FeT4MPyP) and cobalt (II) tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine (CoTSPc) is described. The
modified electrode showed an excellent catalytic activity and stability for the nitrite oxidation
decreasing the peak potentials about 200mV toward less positive values and presenting
much higher peak currents than those obtained on the bare GC electrode. A linear response …
The development of a highly sensitive amperometric sensor for nitrite using a glassy carbon electrode modified with alternated layers of iron(III) tetra-(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)-porphyrin (FeT4MPyP) and cobalt(II) tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine (CoTSPc) is described. The modified electrode showed an excellent catalytic activity and stability for the nitrite oxidation decreasing the peak potentials about 200mV toward less positive values and presenting much higher peak currents than those obtained on the bare GC electrode. A linear response range of 0.2–8.6μmoll−1, with a sensitivity of 0.37μAlμmol−1 and detection limit of 0.04μmoll−1 were obtained with this sensor. The repeatability of the proposed sensor, evaluated in term of relative standard deviation, was verified to be 1.4% for 10 measurements of 0.2μmoll−1 nitrite solution. Interference caused by common ions has been investigated in simulated mixtures containing high concentration level of interfering ions and the sensor was found to be tolerant against these ions. The developed sensor was applied for the nitrite determination in water samples and the results were in agreement with those obtained by a comparative method described in the literature. The average recovery for these samples was 100.1 (±0.7)%.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果