Assessment of explicit models for different photovoltaic technologies

S Pindado, J Cubas, E Roibás-Millán, F Bugallo-Siegel… - Energies, 2018 - mdpi.com
S Pindado, J Cubas, E Roibás-Millán, F Bugallo-Siegel, F Sorribes-Palmer
Energies, 2018mdpi.com
Accurate and simple mathematical models are usually required to assess the performances
of photovoltaic devices. In particular, it is common practice to use explicit models to evaluate
the current–voltage (I–V) performance curves, mainly based on simple analytical
expressions that enable the parameters determination with a little computational effort. Six
different explicit photovoltaic models (ie, explicit I–V equations) by different authors (Akbaba
& Alattawi; El-Tayyan; Karmalkar & Haneefa; Das/Saetre et al.; Das; and Pindado & Cubas) …
Accurate and simple mathematical models are usually required to assess the performances of photovoltaic devices. In particular, it is common practice to use explicit models to evaluate the current–voltage (IV) performance curves, mainly based on simple analytical expressions that enable the parameters determination with a little computational effort. Six different explicit photovoltaic models (i.e., explicit IV equations) by different authors (Akbaba & Alattawi; El-Tayyan; Karmalkar & Haneefa; Das/Saetre et al.; Das; and Pindado & Cubas) are analyzed and compared. This comparison is carried out by fitting these models to eight IV curves for different technologies, including Si, Si polycrystalline, Ga–As, and plastic solar cells. The accuracy of each model depends on the photovoltaic technology to which it is applied. The best fit to each IV curve studied is normally obtained with a different model, with an average deviation under 2% in terms of short-circuit current (normalized RMSE). In general, the model proposed by Karmalkar & Haneefa shows the highest level of accuracy, and is a good fit for all IV curves studied.
MDPI
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果