Cannabis use and neurocognitive performance at 13–14 Years-Old: Optimizing assessment with hair toxicology in the Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD …

NE Wade, AL Wallace, MA Huestis, KM Lisdahl… - Addictive Behaviors, 2024 - Elsevier
Addictive Behaviors, 2024Elsevier
Objective Cannabis is widely used, including in early adolescence, with prevalence rates
varying by measurement method (eg, toxicology vs. self-report). Critical neurocognitive
development occurs throughout adolescence. Given conflicting prior brain-behavior results
in cannabis research, improved measurement of cannabis use in younger adolescents is
needed. Methods Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study
Year 4 follow-up (participant age: 13–14 years-old) included hair samples assessed by LC …
Objective
Cannabis is widely used, including in early adolescence, with prevalence rates varying by measurement method (e.g., toxicology vs. self-report). Critical neurocognitive development occurs throughout adolescence. Given conflicting prior brain-behavior results in cannabis research, improved measurement of cannabis use in younger adolescents is needed.
Methods
Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study Year 4 follow-up (participant age: 13–14 years-old) included hair samples assessed by LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS, quantifying THCCOOH (THC metabolite), THC, and cannabidiol concentrations, and the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery. Youth whose hair was positive for cannabinoids or reported past-year cannabis use were included in a Cannabis Use (CU) group (n = 123) and matched with non-using Controls on sociodemographics (n = 123). Standard and nested ANCOVAs assessed group status predicting cognitive performance, controlling for family relationships. Follow-up correlations assessed cannabinoid hair concentration, self-reported cannabis use, and neurocognition.
Results
CU scored lower on Picture Memory (p = .03) than Controls. Within the CU group, THCCOOH negatively correlated with Picture Vocabulary (r = -0.20, p = .03) and Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention (r = -0.19, p = .04), and past-year cannabis use was negatively associated with List Sorting Working Memory (r = -0.33, p = .0002) and Picture Sequence Memory (r = -0.19, p = .04) performances.
Conclusions
Youth who had used cannabis showed lower scores on an episodic memory task, and more cannabis use was linked to poorer performances on verbal, inhibitory, working memory, and episodic memory tasks. Combining hair toxicology with self-report revealed more brain-behavior relationships than self-report data alone. These youth will be followed to determine long-term substance use and neurocognition trajectories.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果