Central and East European party systems since 1989

E Bakke - Central and Southeast European politics since, 1989 - books.google.com
Central and Southeast European politics since, 1989books.google.com
Two decades after the collapse of communism, Central and East European countries have
come a long way towards liberal democracy and stable party systems, confounding
pessimistic predictions about unstable competition, weak parties, and limited
institutionalization. 1 To be sure, party system stabilization has entailed fissure and fusion,
producing winners and losers along the way; and some party systems have gone through
several restructuring processes, but overall there is surprisingly strong continuity between …
Two decades after the collapse of communism, Central and East European countries have come a long way towards liberal democracy and stable party systems, confounding pessimistic predictions about unstable competition, weak parties, and limited institutionalization. 1 To be sure, party system stabilization has entailed fissure and fusion, producing winners and losers along the way; and some party systems have gone through several restructuring processes, but overall there is surprisingly strong continuity between the parties that are represented in the respective parliaments today and the parties and movements that emerged in the early 1990s. Moreover, not only have ten countries fulfilled the dream of “returning to Europe” by joining the EU–many of the major parties in these countries have also joined European parties such as the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Liberal Democrats in Europe (ELDR), and the European People’s Party (EPP), signaling convergence across the old Iron Curtain. And although the left–right dimension initially played a secondary role in many countries, it has gradually come to the fore, as have other, older cleavages. The tabula rasa thesis has been thoroughly refuted: communism did not erase all social cleavages–on the contrary, there was “evidence of [a] social basis to party support across the region” already in the early 1990s. 2 The conditions under which party systems in Central and Eastern Europe developed were nevertheless quite different. The “triple transition” 3 from communism to democracy, from planned economy to market economy, and from multinational federations to independent “national” states shaped party system development. Institutional design, the tempo of the economic reforms, and redistribution were importantissues, and the national question played a role in all newly independent states (and most of the “old” states). The new democracies also differ from older democracies in that civil society is still weak, electoral participation is lower (and declining), and parties are often “elite clubs.” Moreover, some countries lag behind in the consolidation of democracy as well as party systems. The first section addresses the status of civil society and party membership. The next section provides an overview of institutional convergence and election laws across the region, while the third and fourth sections are devoted to party system development and party families.
books.google.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

Google学术搜索按钮

example.edu/paper.pdf
搜索
获取 PDF 文件
引用
References