is argued that Lattke's sample of taxa (in particular his choice of outgroups) is problematic
because of the acceptance of unreliable previous analyses of ant subfamilial relationships.
Additionally, Lattke's proposed reclassification is inconsistent cladistically. A revised matrix
is presented with the addition of three outgroups and twelve characters (19 taxa and 41
characters in total). This matrix yields a single most parsimonious cladogram (L= 116; CI …