Comparative analysis of model-free and model-based HVAC control for residential demand response

K Kurte, K Amasyali, J Munk, H Zandi - Proceedings of the 8th ACM …, 2021 - dl.acm.org
Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on systems for energy …, 2021dl.acm.org
In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of model-free reinforcement learning (RL)
and model predictive control (MPC) approaches for intelligent control of heating, ventilation,
and air-conditioning (HVAC). Deep-Q-network (DQN) is used as a candidate for model-free
RL algorithm. The two control strategies were developed for residential demand-response
(DR) HVAC system. We considered MPC as our golden standard to compare DQN's
performance. The question we tried to answer through this work was, What% of MPC's …
In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of model-free reinforcement learning (RL) and model predictive control (MPC) approaches for intelligent control of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC). Deep-Q-network (DQN) is used as a candidate for model-free RL algorithm. The two control strategies were developed for residential demand-response (DR) HVAC system. We considered MPC as our golden standard to compare DQN's performance. The question we tried to answer through this work was, What % of MPC's performance can be achieved by model-free RL approach for intelligent HVAC control?. Based on our test result, RL achieved an average of ≈ 62% daily cost saving of MPC. Considering the pure optimization and model-based nature of MPC methods, the RL showed very promising performance. We believe that the interpretations derived from this comparative analysis provide useful insights to choose from various DR approaches and further enhance the performance of the RL-based methods for building energy managements.
ACM Digital Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果