[PDF][PDF] Comparative study on proximate, phytochemical and sensory evaluation of Asystasia gangetica and market herbal tea

EN Odoh, MO Lauretta, TM Ikegwu… - American Journal of …, 2022 - researchgate.net
EN Odoh, MO Lauretta, TM Ikegwu, CA Okolo, JC Mba, CC Ezegbe, KO Olubusayo…
American Journal of Food and Nutrition, 2022researchgate.net
Comparative studies on proximate, phytochemical and sensory evaluation of Asystasia
gangetica and market herbal tea were investigated. Fresh leaf, herbal tea powder and hot
water tea extract samples were subjected to proximate and phytochemical composition
while hot water tea extract samples were subjected to sensory evaluation using
conventional standard methods. Result obtained from the investigation ranged as follows:
10.94 to 91.96, 2.09 to 18.72, 4.94 to 7.95, 0.55 to 2.38, 1.31 to 2.99 and 3.22 to 63.38%; …
Abstract
Comparative studies on proximate, phytochemical and sensory evaluation of Asystasia gangetica and market herbal tea were investigated. Fresh leaf, herbal tea powder and hot water tea extract samples were subjected to proximate and phytochemical composition while hot water tea extract samples were subjected to sensory evaluation using conventional standard methods. Result obtained from the investigation ranged as follows: 10.94 to 91.96, 2.09 to 18.72, 4.94 to 7.95, 0.55 to 2.38, 1.31 to 2.99 and 3.22 to 63.38%; 1.08 to 2.47, 0.45 to 3.89, 1.69 to 8.28, 1.01 to 6.84, 0.86 to 4.29%; 0.52 to 2.43 mg/100g for moisture, crude protein, crude fiber, fat, ash, carbohydrate, flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, steroids and hydrogen cyanide, respectively. Sensory evaluation results for A. gangetica and market herbal tea hot water extract were 4.88 and 5.12; 5.6 and 5.68; 4.96
researchgate.net
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果