Comparing clinical and social‐personality conceptualizations of narcissism

JD Miller, WK Campbell - Journal of personality, 2008 - Wiley Online Library
Journal of personality, 2008Wiley Online Library
There is a lack of consensus surrounding the conceptualization of narcissism. The present
study compared two measures of narcissism—one used in clinical settings (Personality
Diagnostic Questionnaire, PDQ‐4+; Hyler, 1994) and one used in social‐personality
research (Narcissistic Personality Inventory, NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988)—across two
samples. Sample 1 (N= 271) was composed of undergraduates, whereas Sample 2 (N=
211) was composed of parents of the Sample 1 participants. The scales were significantly …
Abstract
There is a lack of consensus surrounding the conceptualization of narcissism. The present study compared two measures of narcissism—one used in clinical settings (Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, PDQ‐4+; Hyler, 1994) and one used in social‐personality research (Narcissistic Personality Inventory, NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988)—across two samples. Sample 1 (N=271) was composed of undergraduates, whereas Sample 2 (N=211) was composed of parents of the Sample 1 participants. The scales were significantly interrelated but manifested divergent relations with general personality traits, personality disorders (including expert prototypal ratings of narcissism), recollections of parenting received, and psychological distress and self‐esteem. PDQ‐4 narcissism captured an emotionally unstable, negative‐affect‐laden, and introverted variant of narcissism; NPI narcissism captured an emotionally resilient, extraverted form. The clinical and social‐personality conceptualizations of narcissism primarily share a tendency to use an antagonistic interpersonal style. Implications for the DSM‐V are discussed.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果