Comparison between Euclidean and Manhattan distance measure for facial expressions classification

L Greche, M Jazouli, N Es-Sbai… - 2017 International …, 2017 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
L Greche, M Jazouli, N Es-Sbai, A Majda, A Zarghili
2017 International conference on wireless technologies, embedded …, 2017ieeexplore.ieee.org
In this paper, we compare classification results, of six facial expressions including joy,
surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, and fear, relying on two different methods of distance
computing between 121 landmark points on the face. Facial features were computed using
L1 norm (Manhattan distance) in the first case and L2 norm (Euclidean distance) in the
second case. Training and test data have been collected using kinect sensor. Labelled
dataset contains sequences of 121 landmark points extracted from the face of each subject …
In this paper, we compare classification results, of six facial expressions including joy, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, and fear, relying on two different methods of distance computing between 121 landmark points on the face. Facial features were computed using L1 norm (Manhattan distance) in the first case and L2 norm (Euclidean distance) in the second case. Training and test data have been collected using kinect sensor. Labelled dataset contains sequences of 121 landmark points extracted from the face of each subject while displaying six facial expressions including joy, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, and fear. Classification has been realized using multi-layer feed forward neural network with one hidden layer. Good recognition rates have been achieved in the early stages of training regarding Euclidean facial distances.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果