Comparison of the Level of Using Metacognitive Strategies during Study between High Achieving and Low Achieving Prospective Teachers.

A Doganay, O Demir - Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2011 - ERIC
Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2011ERIC
The main purpose of this study is to compare the level of using metacognitive strategies
during study between high achieving and low achieving prospective classroom teachers.
This study was designed as a mixed method study. Metacognitive Learning Strategies Scale
developed by Namlu (2004) was used to measure the use of metacognitive strategies during
study. In addition, a semi-structured interview was conducted with selected prospective
classroom teachers to find out how they used metacognitive strategies in their learning. All …
The main purpose of this study is to compare the level of using metacognitive strategies during study between high achieving and low achieving prospective classroom teachers. This study was designed as a mixed method study. Metacognitive Learning Strategies Scale developed by Namlu (2004) was used to measure the use of metacognitive strategies during study. In addition, a semi-structured interview was conducted with selected prospective classroom teachers to find out how they used metacognitive strategies in their learning. All the prospective classroom teachers studying at Caucasus University and Cukurova University, Faculty of Education were the target population of the study. The sample consisted of 690 prospective classroom teachers randomly selected from the population. A sample consisting of 30 prospective teachers was selected from the sample to interview. In analyzing quantitative data, MANOVA and two-factor ANOVA statistical techniques were used. Content analysis technique
ERIC
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果