Development of a knowledge assessment tool for dermatotoxicity caused by inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor
DK Papageorgiou, T Konsatntinidis… - Supportive Care in …, 2012 - Springer
DK Papageorgiou, T Konsatntinidis, N Skandalaki, A Papadouri, T Pappa, S Poulopoulou
Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012•SpringerPurpose The aim of this study was the development of a knowledge assessment tool for
dermatotoxicity caused by inhibitors of EGFR (intravenous regimens). Methods Five nurses
with experience in oncology created a 25-item questionnaire. The questionnaire was
presented to six experts for assessment of face and content validity. Item analysis and
reliability testing were evaluated on the test results of 76 nurses. Results Face and content
validity was achieved for 25 items. Two items with low biserial correlations were deleted …
dermatotoxicity caused by inhibitors of EGFR (intravenous regimens). Methods Five nurses
with experience in oncology created a 25-item questionnaire. The questionnaire was
presented to six experts for assessment of face and content validity. Item analysis and
reliability testing were evaluated on the test results of 76 nurses. Results Face and content
validity was achieved for 25 items. Two items with low biserial correlations were deleted …
Purpose
The aim of this study was the development of a knowledge assessment tool for dermatotoxicity caused by inhibitors of EGFR (intravenous regimens).
Methods
Five nurses with experience in oncology created a 25-item questionnaire. The questionnaire was presented to six experts for assessment of face and content validity. Item analysis and reliability testing were evaluated on the test results of 76 nurses.
Results
Face and content validity was achieved for 25 items. Two items with low biserial correlations were deleted. The values for item difficulty range from 0.2 to 0.7. The values for item discrimination ranged from 0.25 to 0.64. The complete post-tested 23-item questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency with Kuder–Richardson 20 score of 0.909. The Cohen κ tests showed that the questionnaire has very good test–retest reliability. The specific tool can be used in several studies, leading to the development of educational interventions.
Springer