Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings

C Tamura, H Shinmoto, S Soga… - Journal of magnetic …, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
C Tamura, H Shinmoto, S Soga, T Okamura, H Sato, T Okuaki, Y Pang, S Kosuda, T Kaji
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2014Wiley Online Library
Purpose To evaluate the differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)
between prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and benign peripheral zone
(PZ). Materials and Methods Twenty‐four foci of prostate cancer, 41 BPH nodules (14
stromal and 27 nonstromal hyperplasia), and 20 benign PZ from 20 patients who underwent
radical prostatectomy were investigated. Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) was performed
using 11 b‐values (0–1500 s/mm2). DKI model relates DWI signal decay to parameters that …
Purpose
To evaluate the differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) between prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and benign peripheral zone (PZ).
Materials and Methods
Twenty‐four foci of prostate cancer, 41 BPH nodules (14 stromal and 27 nonstromal hyperplasia), and 20 benign PZ from 20 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were investigated. Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using 11 b‐values (0–1500 s/mm2). DKI model relates DWI signal decay to parameters that reflect non‐Gaussian diffusion coefficient (D) and deviations from normal distribution (K). A mixed model analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the statistical significance of the metrics of DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
Results
K was significantly higher in prostate cancer and stromal BPH than in benign PZ (1.19 ± 0.24 and 0.99 ± 0.28 versus 0.63 ± 0.23, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). K showed a trend toward higher levels in prostate cancer than in stromal BPH (1.19 ± 0.24 versus 0.99 ± 0.28, P = 0.051). On the ROC analyses, a significant difference in area under the curve was not observed between K and ADC, however, K showed the highest sensitivity among three parameters.
Conclusion
DKI may contribute to the imaging diagnosis of prostate cancer, especially in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and BPH. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:723–729. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果