Efficacy of face masks, neck gaiters and face shields for reducing the expulsion of simulated cough-generated aerosols

WG Lindsley, FM Blachere, BF Law… - Aerosol Science and …, 2021 - Taylor & Francis
WG Lindsley, FM Blachere, BF Law, DH Beezhold, JD Noti
Aerosol Science and Technology, 2021Taylor & Francis
Face masks are recommended to reduce community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. One of
the primary benefits of face masks and other coverings is as source control devices to
reduce the expulsion of respiratory aerosols during coughing, breathing, and speaking.
Face shields and neck gaiters have been proposed as an alternative to face masks, but
information about face shields and neck gaiters as source control devices is limited. We
used a cough aerosol simulator with a pliable skin headform to propel small aerosol …
Abstract
Face masks are recommended to reduce community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. One of the primary benefits of face masks and other coverings is as source control devices to reduce the expulsion of respiratory aerosols during coughing, breathing, and speaking. Face shields and neck gaiters have been proposed as an alternative to face masks, but information about face shields and neck gaiters as source control devices is limited. We used a cough aerosol simulator with a pliable skin headform to propel small aerosol particles (0 to 7 µm) into different face coverings. An N95 respirator blocked 99% (standard deviation (SD) 0.3%) of the cough aerosol, a medical grade procedure mask blocked 59% (SD 6.9%), a 3-ply cotton cloth face mask blocked 51% (SD 7.7%), and a polyester neck gaiter blocked 47% (SD 7.5%) as a single layer and 60% (SD 7.2%) when folded into a double layer. In contrast, the face shield blocked 2% (SD 15.3%) of the cough aerosol. Our results suggest that face masks and neck gaiters are preferable to face shields as source control devices for cough aerosols.
Taylor & Francis Online
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果