Workflow engines used to script scientific experiments involving numerical simulation, data analysis, instruments, edge sensors, and artificial intelligence have to deal with the complexities of hardware, software, resource availability, and the collaborative nature of science. In this paper, we survey workflow engines used in data-intensive and compute-intensive discovery pipelines from scientific disciplines such as astronomy, high energy physics, earth system science, bio-medicine, and material science and present a qualitative analysis of their respective capabilities. We compare 5 popular workflow engines and their differentiated approach to job orchestration, job launching, data management and provenance, security authentication, ease-of-use, workflow description, and scripting semantics. The comparisons presented in this paper allow practitioners to choose the appropriate engine for their scientific experiment and lead to recommendations for future work.