Since the latter half of the 20th century, researchers have begun to integrate biological and social contexts into the analysis of skeletal trauma in the archaeological record (Buzon, 2011; Lovejoy & Heiple, 1981). Numerous studies have been published, detailing the biocultural circumstances surrounding injury in specific spatial and temporal contexts, including Anglo-Saxon England (Judd & Roberts, 1999), Medieval Serbia (Djuric, Roberts, Rakocevic, Djonic, & Lesic, 2006), prehistoric Peru (Murphy, 2004), and Mississippian Tennessee (Powell, 2008). Recently, researchers have begun to examine possible archaeological extensions of a clinical phenomenon: injury recidivism (Dougherty, 2011; Redfern, 2006; Judd, 2002). Injury recidivists are defined as individuals who experience an injury within a few years of a prior injury occurring, specifically at or near the site of the previous fracture (Sims et al., 1989). Given the inability of the bioarchaeologist to know the exact timing of injury, this definition has been modified to include individuals who have experienced multiple injuries throughout the life course (Judd, 2002).