Examining the causal effect of pretrial detention on case outcomes: a judge fixed effect instrumental variable approach

S Koppel, T Bergin, R Ropac, I Randolph… - Journal of Experimental …, 2024 - Springer
S Koppel, T Bergin, R Ropac, I Randolph, H Joseph
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2024Springer
Exploiting quasi-random assignment to NYC arraignment judges with varying propensities
to detain, we use a judge fixed effect instrumental variable approach to estimate the impact
of pretrial detention on several case outcomes: guilty plea, conviction, and carceral
sentence. We find that any period of pretrial detention increases the likelihood of a guilty
plea by 23 percentage points, a conviction by 24 percentage points, and a carceral sentence
by 35 percentage points. Stratified analyses show differences in the size of the effect by …
Abstract
Exploiting quasi-random assignment to NYC arraignment judges with varying propensities to detain, we use a judge fixed effect instrumental variable approach to estimate the impact of pretrial detention on several case outcomes: guilty plea, conviction, and carceral sentence. We find that any period of pretrial detention increases the likelihood of a guilty plea by 23 percentage points, a conviction by 24 percentage points, and a carceral sentence by 35 percentage points. Stratified analyses show differences in the size of the effect by charge severity and race: felony defendants experienced a larger effect on all case outcomes; non-Black defendants experienced a larger effect on guilty pleas and convictions; and Black defendants experienced a larger effect on carceral sentences.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果