[HTML][HTML] Identification of cyclin protein using gradient boost decision tree algorithm

H Zulfiqar, SS Yuan, QL Huang, ZJ Sun, FY Dao… - Computational and …, 2021 - Elsevier
H Zulfiqar, SS Yuan, QL Huang, ZJ Sun, FY Dao, XL Yu, H Lin
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2021Elsevier
Cyclin proteins are capable to regulate the cell cycle by forming a complex with cyclin-
dependent kinases to activate cell cycle. Correct recognition of cyclin proteins could provide
key clues for studying their functions. However, their sequences share low similarity, which
results in poor prediction for sequence similarity-based methods. Thus, it is urgent to
construct a machine learning model to identify cyclin proteins. This study aimed to develop a
computational model to discriminate cyclin proteins from non-cyclin proteins. In our model …
Abstract
Cyclin proteins are capable to regulate the cell cycle by forming a complex with cyclin-dependent kinases to activate cell cycle. Correct recognition of cyclin proteins could provide key clues for studying their functions. However, their sequences share low similarity, which results in poor prediction for sequence similarity-based methods. Thus, it is urgent to construct a machine learning model to identify cyclin proteins. This study aimed to develop a computational model to discriminate cyclin proteins from non-cyclin proteins. In our model, protein sequences were encoded by seven kinds of features that are amino acid composition, composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs, tri peptide composition, pseudo amino acid composition, geary correlation, normalized moreau-broto autocorrelation and composition/transition/distribution. Afterward, these features were optimized by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) with incremental feature selection (IFS) technique. A gradient boost decision tree (GBDT) classifier was trained on the optimal features. Five-fold cross-validated results showed that our model would identify cyclins with an accuracy of 93.06% and AUC value of 0.971, which are higher than the two recent studies on the same data.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果