Lifestyle-, environmental-, and additional health factors associated with an increased sperm DNA fragmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Szabó, S Váncsa, P Hegyi, A Váradi… - Reproductive Biology …, 2023 - Springer
A Szabó, S Váncsa, P Hegyi, A Váradi, A Forintos, T Filipov, J Ács, N Ács, T Szarvas…
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 2023Springer
Introduction Infertility affects one in every six couples in developed countries, and
approximately 50% is of male origin. In 2021, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing
became an evidence-based test for fertility evaluations depicting fertility more clearly than
standard semen parameters. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the potential prognostic
factors of a higher SDF. Methods We conducted a systematic search in three medical
databases and included studies investigating any risk factors for SDF values. We calculated …
Introduction
Infertility affects one in every six couples in developed countries, and approximately 50% is of male origin. In 2021, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing became an evidence-based test for fertility evaluations depicting fertility more clearly than standard semen parameters. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the potential prognostic factors of a higher SDF.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search in three medical databases and included studies investigating any risk factors for SDF values. We calculated mean differences (MD) in SDF with 95% confidence interval (CI) for exposed and non-exposed individuals.
Results
We included 190 studies in our analysis. In the group of associated health conditions, varicocele (MD = 13.62%, CI: 9.39–17.84) and impaired glucose tolerance (MD = 13.75%, CI: 6.99–20.51) had the most significant increase in SDF. Among malignancies, testicular tumors had the highest impact, with a maximum of MD = 11.3% (CI: 7.84–14.76). Among infections, the overall effects of both Chlamydia and HPV were negligible. Of lifestyle factors, smoking had the most disruptive effect on SDF – an increase of 9.19% (CI: 4.33–14.06). Different periods of sexual abstinence did not show significant variations in SDF values. Age seemed to have a more drastic effect on SDF from age 50 onwards, with a mean difference of 12.58% (CI: 7.31–17.86). Pollution also had a detrimental effect – 9.68% (CI: 6.85–12.52).
Conclusion
Of the above risk factors, varicocele, impaired glucose tolerance, testicular tumors, smoking, pollution, and paternal age of over 50 were associated with the highest SDF.
Trial registration
CRD42021282533.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果