Male and female victims of male bullies: Social status differences by gender and informant source

C Berger, PC Rodkin - Sex Roles, 2009 - Springer
C Berger, PC Rodkin
Sex Roles, 2009Springer
We examine two sources of variation in victims' social adjustment:(a) the informant who
identifies a child as victim (ie, peer, self, or both), and (b) victim gender. Peer and self
nominations were provided by 508 fourth and fifth graders from the Midwest US Girls were
more likely than boys to be victimized, and victims were evenly distributed among informant
source. Self-nominated female victims had lower social status and were involved in more
antipathies than their peer-nominated counterparts. Among boys, self-and-peer reported …
Abstract
We examine two sources of variation in victims’ social adjustment: (a) the informant who identifies a child as victim (i.e., peer, self, or both), and (b) victim gender. Peer and self nominations were provided by 508 fourth and fifth graders from the Midwest U.S. Girls were more likely than boys to be victimized, and victims were evenly distributed among informant source. Self-nominated female victims had lower social status and were involved in more antipathies than their peer-nominated counterparts. Among boys, self-and-peer reported victims had the lowest social status. Having friends was associated with positive social adjustment. Implications are discussed for at-risk victim subgroups: girls whose self-reports of victimization are not validated by others, and boys whose victimization is publicly acknowledged.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果