Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section at the Fermilab Tevatron collider using a <?format ?>cone-based jet algorithm
T Aaltonen, J Adelman, T Akimoto, MG Albrow… - Physical Review D …, 2008 - APS
We present a measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp¯ collisions at s= 1.96 TeV
based on data collected by the CDF II detector with an integrated luminosity of 1.13 fb-1. The
measurement was made using the cone-based midpoint jet clustering algorithm in the
rapidity region of| y|< 2.1. The results are consistent with next-to-leading-order perturbative
QCD predictions based on recent parton distribution functions (PDFs), and are expected to
provide increased precision in PDFs at high parton momentum fraction x. The results are …
based on data collected by the CDF II detector with an integrated luminosity of 1.13 fb-1. The
measurement was made using the cone-based midpoint jet clustering algorithm in the
rapidity region of| y|< 2.1. The results are consistent with next-to-leading-order perturbative
QCD predictions based on recent parton distribution functions (PDFs), and are expected to
provide increased precision in PDFs at high parton momentum fraction x. The results are …
Erratum: Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section at the Fermilab Tevatron collider using a cone-based jet algorithm [Phys. Rev. D 78, 052006 (2008)]
T Aaltonen, J Adelman, T Akimoto, MG Albrow… - Physical Review D …, 2009 - APS
The measurement of the inclusive jet cross section using a cone-based jet algorithm in our
recent article [1] requires corrections in Tables VI and VIII–XII. In Table VI, the columns for
the systematic uncertainties from the unfolding correction, pT-spectrum modeling, and jet
energy resolution modeling were mislabeled. Tables VIII–XII did not use the final unfolding
corrections shown in Fig. 10 which are obtained as described in Sec. V C. Miscalculations in
error propagation also affected Tables VIII–XII. The corrected tables are shown in Tables I, II …
recent article [1] requires corrections in Tables VI and VIII–XII. In Table VI, the columns for
the systematic uncertainties from the unfolding correction, pT-spectrum modeling, and jet
energy resolution modeling were mislabeled. Tables VIII–XII did not use the final unfolding
corrections shown in Fig. 10 which are obtained as described in Sec. V C. Miscalculations in
error propagation also affected Tables VIII–XII. The corrected tables are shown in Tables I, II …