Meningkatkan Adversity Quotient Siswa Menggunakan Autograph

E Syafitri, S Saragih, EE Napitupulu… - Journal of Science …, 2022 - jurnal.goretanpena.com
Journal of Science and Social Research, 2022jurnal.goretanpena.com
This study aims to determine the difference in adversity quotient between students who learn
to use the Autograph learning media and students who receive conventional learning. The
formulation of the problem in this study is" Is there a difference between the adversity
quotient of students who learn to use Autograph learning media and students who receive
conventional learning?". This research is a quasi-experimental research, where the teacher
plays a direct role in the learning process and the researcher acts as an observer. The …
Abstract
This study aims to determine the difference in adversity quotient between students who learn to use the Autograph learning media and students who receive conventional learning. The formulation of the problem in this study is" Is there a difference between the adversity quotient of students who learn to use Autograph learning media and students who receive conventional learning?". This research is a quasi-experimental research, where the teacher plays a direct role in the learning process and the researcher acts as an observer. The subjects in this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Arifin Rahuning totaling 100 people and as a sample of class VIII-1 totaling 28 people. While the object of this research is the adversity quotient of students towards learning mathematics. Collecting data in this study using observation sheets and adversity quotient. To find out the results of this study, it was carried out using the t test and to determine whether or not there were differences in the adversity quotient of students towards learning mathematics. Based on the results of data analysis carried out, it was concluded that there was a difference in the adversity quotient between students who learned to use the Autograph learning media and students who received conventional learning with at count= 8.29 greater than t table at the 5% significance level and significant 1% of 2.14 and 2.96.
jurnal.goretanpena.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果