Modified resin infiltration of non-, micro-and cavitated proximal caries lesions in vitro

H Askar, F Schwendicke, J Lausch, H Meyer-Lückel… - Journal of dentistry, 2018 - Elsevier
H Askar, F Schwendicke, J Lausch, H Meyer-Lückel, S Paris
Journal of dentistry, 2018Elsevier
Objective Infiltrant resin (IR) is currently indicated for non-cavitated caries lesions. However,
modifying the technique might expand its indication spectrum to micro-cavitated lesions. The
present study aimed to evaluate the penetration/filling ability of a newly developed micro-
filled infiltrant resin (MFIR) in non-, micro-and cavitated natural caries lesions. Materials and
methods Proximal lesions in 120 extracted human teeth with ICDAS-2 (n= 30), 3 (n= 45) and
5 (n= 45) lesions were etched with 15% hydrochloric acid gel for 2 min and allocated to one …
Objective
Infiltrant resin (IR) is currently indicated for non-cavitated caries lesions. However, modifying the technique might expand its indication spectrum to micro-cavitated lesions. The present study aimed to evaluate the penetration/filling ability of a newly developed micro-filled infiltrant resin (MFIR) in non-, micro- and cavitated natural caries lesions.
Materials and methods
Proximal lesions in 120 extracted human teeth with ICDAS-2 (n = 30), 3 (n = 45) and 5 (n = 45) lesions were etched with 15% hydrochloric acid gel for 2 min and allocated to one of the following treatments; IR: lesions (ICDAS-2, 3 and 5; each n = 15) were treated with commercial infiltrant resin for 3 min. MFIR: experimental MFIR [55 wt% IR plus 45 wt% organic fillers] was applied to lesions (ICDAS-2, 3 and 5; each n = 15) for 3 min. IR+FC: IR was applied for 3 min, light-cured, and cavities (ICDAS-3 and 5; each n = 15) filled with flowable composite (FC). Percentage infiltration of the demineralized enamel (Inf.%) and percentage filling of the cavity (Fill.%) were analyzed using dual-fluorescence staining and confocal microscopy.
Results
No significant differences in Inf.% (range of medians: 57%-100%) were observed between different treatments (p > 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis) within each ICDAS-code. Fill.% of cavities was significantly higher in groups MFIR (median in ICDAS-3/-5: 100%/100%) and IR + FC (100%/100%) than IR (25%/38%) (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
MFIR showed similar penetration into natural lesions as the commercial infiltrant, but better ability to fill cavitated areas.
Clinical relevance
MFIR and IR + FC might provide a new micro-invasive treatment for small cavitated proximal lesions.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果