Qualifications frameworks and their conflicting social imaginaries of globalisation

LL Sarauw - Learning and Teaching, 2012 - berghahnjournals.com
Learning and Teaching, 2012berghahnjournals.com
Critics often see the European Bologna Process as a univocal standardisation of higher
education. By exploring how different qualifications frameworks project different social
imaginaries of globalisation, this article takes a different stance. The overarching
qualifications framework of the Bologna Process rests on a socially constituted and
contested concept of globalisation as a change towards a more diverse and unforeseeable
world, which calls for the development of flexible, lifelong learners with a broad knowledge …
Critics often see the European Bologna Process as a univocal standardisation of higher education. By exploring how different qualifications frameworks project different social imaginaries of globalisation, this article takes a different stance. The overarching qualifications framework of the Bologna Process rests on a socially constituted and contested concept of globalisation as a change towards a more diverse and unforeseeable world, which calls for the development of flexible, lifelong learners with a broad knowledge base and strong democratic competencies. Although this social imaginary is widely known, I argue that it is also highly contested. For example, the Danish qualifications framework of 2003 projects a social imaginary of globalisation as a change towards a smaller and more predictable world, which enables a novel and more efficient alignment of the curriculum towards specific professional needs, and where the development of a broad knowledge base and democratic competencies are no longer prioritised.
berghahnjournals.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果