Relating decision making styles to predicting selfefficacy and a generalized expectation of success and failure

TE Nygren, RJ White - Proceedings of the Human Factors …, 2005 - journals.sagepub.com
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual …, 2005journals.sagepub.com
The theoretical and applied distinction between a propensity toward a more intuitive
decision style versus a more analytical style has gained prominence in recent years. A self-
report measure, the Decision Making Styles Inventory, is presented and is shown to
differentiate among those who endorse an analytical, an intuitive, or an avoidant, regret-
based decision style. Results from one study, a horse race betting task, indicated that those
who endorsed a decision style, particularly those endorsing a flexible analytical and intuitive …
The theoretical and applied distinction between a propensity toward a more intuitive decision style versus a more analytical style has gained prominence in recent years. A self-report measure, the Decision Making Styles Inventory, is presented and is shown to differentiate among those who endorse an analytical, an intuitive, or an avoidant, regret-based decision style. Results from one study, a horse race betting task, indicated that those who endorsed a decision style, particularly those endorsing a flexible analytical and intuitive style, performed better on the task than those who did not. A second study clearly showed that decision style was related to self reports of self-efficacy, optimism, and self-regard. These results suggest that having either an analytical, intuitive or combined decision style is beneficial to the decision maker.
Sage Journals
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果