Saying meritocracy and doing privilege
S Khan, C Jerolmack - The Sociological Quarterly, 2013 - Taylor & Francis
The Sociological Quarterly, 2013•Taylor & Francis
This article describes the relationship between saying and doing. It argues that focusing on
the discrepancy between participants' accounts and their actions is one of the greatest
analytical strengths of ethnography. We make this case by drawing upon an ethnography of
an elite boarding school. We also reflect on the way that two ethnographers worked together
to better understand the social significance of accounts that are incongruent with situated
behavior. We conclude by arguing that qualitative researchers must be more sensitive to the …
the discrepancy between participants' accounts and their actions is one of the greatest
analytical strengths of ethnography. We make this case by drawing upon an ethnography of
an elite boarding school. We also reflect on the way that two ethnographers worked together
to better understand the social significance of accounts that are incongruent with situated
behavior. We conclude by arguing that qualitative researchers must be more sensitive to the …
This article describes the relationship between saying and doing. It argues that focusing on the discrepancy between participants' accounts and their actions is one of the greatest analytical strengths of ethnography. We make this case by drawing upon an ethnography of an elite boarding school. We also reflect on the way that two ethnographers worked together to better understand the social significance of accounts that are incongruent with situated behavior. We conclude by arguing that qualitative researchers must be more sensitive to the different kinds of claims that can be made with interview versus observational data.
Taylor & Francis Online以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果