Screening of hydrogel-based scaffolds for dental pulp regeneration—a systematic review
KA Fukushima, MM Marques, TK Tedesco… - Archives of Oral …, 2019 - Elsevier
Objective The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the most appropriate hydrogel
scaffold type (natural, synthetic or hybrid) to be applied with stem cells for dental pulp
regeneration. The findings should help clinicians make an informed choice about the
appropriate scaffold to be applied for this approach. Design Three electronic databases
were searched (Medline, Web of Science and Scopus). The review was conducted based on
the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Results …
scaffold type (natural, synthetic or hybrid) to be applied with stem cells for dental pulp
regeneration. The findings should help clinicians make an informed choice about the
appropriate scaffold to be applied for this approach. Design Three electronic databases
were searched (Medline, Web of Science and Scopus). The review was conducted based on
the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Results …
[PDF][PDF] Screening of hydrogel-based scaffolds for dental pulp regeneration–a systematic
KA Fukushimaa, MM Marquesb, TK Tedescoa… - 2018 - academia.edu
Objective: the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the most appropriate hydrogel
scaffold type (natural, synthetic or hybrid) to be applied with stem cells for dental pulp
regeneration. The findings should help clinicians make an informed choice about the
appropriate scaffold to be applied for this approach. Design: Three electronic databases
were searched (Medline, Web of Science and Scopus). The review was conducted based on
the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalysis (PRISMA). Results …
scaffold type (natural, synthetic or hybrid) to be applied with stem cells for dental pulp
regeneration. The findings should help clinicians make an informed choice about the
appropriate scaffold to be applied for this approach. Design: Three electronic databases
were searched (Medline, Web of Science and Scopus). The review was conducted based on
the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalysis (PRISMA). Results …
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果