Seismic monitoring in Gujarat, India, during 2020 coronavirus lockdown and lessons learned

S Kumar, RC Kumar, KS Roy… - Seismological …, 2021 - pubs.geoscienceworld.org
Seismological Research Letters, 2021pubs.geoscienceworld.org
The Gujarat region, situated in the westernmost part of India, experienced a deadly
intraplate 2001 M w 7.6 Bhuj earthquake. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Institute of
Seismological Research established the Gujarat (India) seismic network in 2006. The
network is being operated in online and offline modes, whereas, seismicity monitoring is
being done in near‐real‐time, using data received from the online seismic stations. The
Coronavirus disease‐19 lockdown provided an opportunity to assess the network reliability …
Abstract
The Gujarat region, situated in the westernmost part of India, experienced a deadly intraplate 2001 M w 7.6 Bhuj earthquake. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Institute of Seismological Research established the Gujarat (India) seismic network in 2006. The network is being operated in online and offline modes, whereas, seismicity monitoring is being done in near‐real‐time, using data received from the online seismic stations. The Coronavirus disease‐19 lockdown provided an opportunity to assess the network reliability in a difficult and challenging scenario. The positive aspect of the lockdown is reflected in signal‐to‐noise ratio, which improved significantly at all the sites during the lockdown, with more prominent being at sites located on top of the Quaternary sediments due to the absence of high‐frequency anthropogenic noise. A sharp fall in the seismic background noise is noticed at most of the stations during the lockdown period, with respect to the prelockdown period. We used the lockdown data to identify other natural sources of noise, besides anthropogenic. The lockdown helped in solving the enigma of seismicity in certain pockets, which turned out to be related to quarry blasts.
GeoScienceWorld
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果