The alternative refrigerant dilemma for refrigerator-freezers: Truth or consequences

EA Vineyard - 1991 - osti.gov
1991osti.gov
In an effort to select a refrigerant that has minimal impact on energy consumption and the
environment, a screening analysis of potential refrigerants was performed that resulted in
the selection of six candidates. The screening results show that R-134a, R-134, R-152a, R-
134a/R-152a, R-22/R-152a/R-124, and R-134a/R-152a/R-124 are the most promising
refrigerants based on the following criteria: ozone depletion potential, greenhouse warming
potential, coefficient of performance, and safety. Energy consumption tests were performed …
In an effort to select a refrigerant that has minimal impact on energy consumption and the environment, a screening analysis of potential refrigerants was performed that resulted in the selection of six candidates. The screening results show that R-134a, R-134, R-152a, R-134a/R-152a, R-22/R-152a/R-124, and R-134a/R-152a/R-124 are the most promising refrigerants based on the following criteria: ozone depletion potential, greenhouse warming potential, coefficient of performance, and safety. Energy consumption tests were performed for the three pure refrigerants in accordance with the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers standard for household refrigerators and household freezers. The results indicate an increased energy consumption of 6.8%, 7.3%, and 7.3%, respectively for R-134, R-152a, and R-134a in the most efficient oil. However, when the effects of compressor efficiency are taken into account, the normalized energy consumption results in an increase of only 2.7% for R-152a and 5.5% for both R-134a and R-134. 14 refs., 5 tabs.
osti.gov
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果