The global war on terror and the detention debate: The applicability of Geneva Convention III

BJ Falk - J. Int'l L & Int'l Rel., 2007 - HeinOnline
J. Int'l L & Int'l Rel., 2007HeinOnline
On October 7, 2001, less than one month after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York and
Washington, DC, the United States commenced conflict operations in Afghanistan, with the
express purpose of removing the Taliban from power and capturing and destroying al
Qaeda leaders, agents, and bases of activity and training.'By late November, the legal status
and treatment of combatants captured in the new'Global War on Terror'(GWOT) became a
matter of international debate and concern. However, in the succeeding five years, much of …
On October 7, 2001, less than one month after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, DC, the United States commenced conflict operations in Afghanistan, with the express purpose of removing the Taliban from power and capturing and destroying al Qaeda leaders, agents, and bases of activity and training.'By late November, the legal status and treatment of combatants captured in the new'Global War on Terror'(GWOT) became a matter of international debate and concern. However, in the succeeding five years, much of the controversy has shifted to the longterm detention, treatment and legal status of'enemy combatants', particularly those held in US custody in Guant~ namo Bay and other secret detention centers abroad. Commencing with a general discussion of the applicability of international humanitarian law (IHL) to the initial conflict in Afghanistan, this article will examine, through a close textual analysis, the original contours of this debate as it emerged in memoranda produced by key members of the Bush executive from the fall of 2001
HeinOnline
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果