Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

S Wessely - The lancet, 1998 - thelancet.com
… Do researchers believe that peer review is a fair system? Surveys of grant applicants
have been carried out at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Science Foundation (NSF), …

Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications

…, Cochrane Methodology Review Group - … systematic reviews, 1996 - cochranelibrary.com
… sets of reviewers and their correlation with nine characteristics of the proposals (Applicant's
interest, personal relationship between applicant and reviewer). The study concluded that …

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist

HO Witteman, M Hendricks, S Straus, C Tannenbaum - Biorxiv, 2017 - biorxiv.org
… In the model, we coded this as true (1) if the application was approved after the peer review
process, and false (0) if not. Because our aim was to analyze the effects of peer review, we …

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

R Tamblyn, N Girard, CJ Qian, J Hanley - Cmaj, 2018 - Can Med Assoc
… BACKGROUND: Peer review is used to determine what research is … of peer review and
factors influencing ratings of grant … biases in peer review that penalize female applicants and are …

Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices

H Abdoul, C Perrey, P Amiel, F Tubach, S Gottot… - 2012 - journals.plos.org
… Additional studies are needed to explore the roles of each participant in the grant application
peer review process. Third, we found evidence of subjectivity and heterogeneity in the way …

[HTML][HTML] Does gender matter in grant peer review?

R Mutz, L Bornmann, HD Daniel - Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 2015 - econtent.hogrefe.com
peer review process is gender bias. In this study we evaluated the grant peer review process
(external reviewers… influence of applicant’s gender and reviewers’ gender on the reviewers’ …

The participation and motivations of grant peer reviewers: A comprehensive survey

SA Gallo, LA Thompson, KB Schmaling… - Science and engineering …, 2020 - Springer
… a grant peer review panel during the past 3 years, although a substantial minority had not
(24% for panel reviews and 40% for ad-hoc reviews… are utilizing as grant applicants most likely …

The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making

S Bendiscioli - EMBO reports, 2019 - embopress.org
… of grant proposals in Spain found that reviewers did change their evaluation once they could
see applicants’ … application might help to limit reviewers’ conscious or unconscious bias. …

Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications

S Gallo, L Thompson, K Schmaling… - Environment Systems and …, 2018 - Springer
… to tease out reviewer decision-making processes in grant peer review, particularly with regard
… between the perceptions of grant reviewers and applicants have unearthed an interesting …

Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants' publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants

J Neufeld, N Huber, A Wegner - Research Evaluation, 2013 - academic.oup.com
… ’ amongst potential applicants. As the European Research Council Starting Grants is a highly
… between peer review-based selection decisions and applicants’ publication performance. …