In a thoughtful comment on our paper (Zellweger & Zenger, Forthcoming), Sergeeva,
Bhardwaj, and Dimov (2022) joined us in advocating for a pragmatist perspective on …

In this dialogue paper, we consider Zellweger and Zenger's (Forthcoming)
conceptualization, rooted in pragmatism, of entrepreneurs as scientists. While we agree that …

In “A Realist Perspective of Entrepreneurship: Opportunities As Propensities,” Ramoglou
and Tsang (2016) forge an “actualization approach” in an attempt to bypass the now …

The AMR Decade Award for Shane and Venkataraman's (2000)“The Promise of
Entrepreneurship As a Field of Research” recently stimulated a number of commentaries …

Both history of science and creativity research have shown that reformulating the questions
we ask can lead to breakthroughs more often than trying harder to search for more rigorous …

Whether entrepreneurial opportunities are discovered or created is a long-standing dilemma
in the study of entrepreneurship. In our recent article (Ramoglou & Tsang, 2016) we framed …

In this essay, we outline the provocative argument that in the realm of human affairs there
exists an “entrepreneurial method” analogous to the scientific method spelled out by Francis …

Since the publication of “A Realist Perspective of Entrepreneurship: Opportunities As
Propensities”(Ramoglou & Tsang, 2016), we have had the pleasure of having several …

We challenge a stream of thought that focuses on drawing what we see as a frivolous
contrast between creation and discovery view of entrepreneurship. Its detachment from the …

Ramoglou and McMullen (2022) offers a logically rigorous extension and refinement of
earlier work on the conceptual foundations of entrepreneurship theory–the actualization …