In this paper, we discuss the ethics of automated driving. More specifically, we discuss
responsible human-robot coordination within mixed traffic: ie traffic involving both automated …

Self‐driving cars hold out the promise of being much safer than regular cars. Yet they cannot
be 100% safe. Accordingly, we need to think about who should be held responsible when …

The ethics of autonomous cars and automated driving have been a subject of discussion in
research for a number of years (cf. Lin 2015; Goodall in Transportation Research Record …

Automated driving raises an interesting set of ethical questions not necessarily about who is
to blame when something goes wrong (Lin 2015). Rather, we can ask who should make the …

To draw a comprehensive and cohesive understanding of human–vehicle cooperation in
automated driving, a review is made on key studies in human–robot interaction and human …

The paper presents a framework to realise “meaningful human control” over Automated
Driving Systems. The framework is based on an original synthesis of the results of the …

Full automation is good. But the path toward full automation must traverse the dangerous
stages of partial automation, where the very successes of automation may make human …

The prospect of automatized car traffic confronts ethics, law, and politics with novel and far-
reaching questions. It cannot be excluded that automatized cars meet with critical situations …

When automobiles were first introduced in the early 1900s, poor communication and unsafe
interactions between drivers and other road users generated resistance. This created a …

In this paper, we explore and describe what is needed to allow connected and automated
vehicles (CAVs) to break traffic rules in order to minimise road safety risk and to operate with …