Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - Journal of Informetrics, 2011 - Elsevier
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this …
Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis
Narrative reviews of peer review research have concluded that there is negligible evidence
of gender bias in the awarding of grants based on peer review. Here, we report the findings …
of gender bias in the awarding of grants based on peer review. Here, we report the findings …
Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential
biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant …
biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant …
Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports
Objectives To examine whether the gender of applicants and peer reviewers and other
factors influence peer review of grant proposals submitted to a national funding agency …
factors influence peer review of grant proposals submitted to a national funding agency …
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study
The universalism norm of the ethos of science requires that contributions to science are not
excluded because of the contributors' gender, nationality, social status, or other irrelevant …
excluded because of the contributors' gender, nationality, social status, or other irrelevant …
[HTML][HTML] Strategies to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants: a rapid scoping review
Objective To review the literature on strategies implemented or identified to prevent or
reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants. Methods Studies of any type of …
reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants. Methods Studies of any type of …
[HTML][HTML] Does gender matter in grant peer review?
One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this
study we evaluated the grant peer review process (external reviewers' ratings, and board of …
study we evaluated the grant peer review process (external reviewers' ratings, and board of …
Are peer reviews of grant proposals reliable? An analysis of Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funding applications
J Jerrim, R Vries - The Social Science Journal, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Peer review is widely used throughout academia, most notably in the publication of journal
articles and the allocation of research grants. Yet peer review has been subject to much …
articles and the allocation of research grants. Yet peer review has been subject to much …
[HTML][HTML] Gender diversity of research consortia contributes to funding decisions in a multi-stage grant peer-review process
S Bianchini, P Llerena, S Öcalan-Özel… - Humanities and Social …, 2022 - nature.com
This study seeks to draw connections between the grant proposal peer-review and the
gender representation in research consortia. We examined the implementation of a multi …
gender representation in research consortia. We examined the implementation of a multi …
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
BACKGROUND: Peer review is used to determine what research is funded and published,
yet little is known about its effectiveness, and it is suspected that there may be biases. We …
yet little is known about its effectiveness, and it is suspected that there may be biases. We …