Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity

MB Elamin, DN Flynn, D Bassler, M Briel… - Journal of clinical …, 2009 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: To assist investigators planning, coordinating, and conducting systematic
reviews in the selection of data-extraction tools for conducting systematic reviews. STUDY …

Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey

RB Büchter, T Rombey, T Mathes, H Khalil… - Journal of Clinical …, 2023 - Elsevier
Objective Data extraction is a prerequisite for analyzing, summarizing, and interpreting
evidence in systematic reviews. Yet guidance is limited, and little is known about current …

Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance

KA Robinson, R Chou, ND Berkman… - Journal of clinical …, 2016 - Elsevier
Objectives As time and cost constraints in the conduct of systematic reviews increase, the
need to consider the use of existing systematic reviews also increases. We developed …

Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance

RB Büchter, A Weise, D Pieper - BMC medical research methodology, 2020 - Springer
Background Data extraction forms link systematic reviews with primary research and provide
the foundation for appraising, analysing, summarising and interpreting a body of evidence …

A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews

JR Treadwell, S Singh, R Talati, ML McPheeters… - Journal of clinical …, 2012 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviewers often use a “best evidence” approach to address the key
questions, but what is meant by “best” is often unclear. The goal of this project was to create …

No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews

M Sampson, J McGowan, J Tetzlaff, E Cogo… - Journal of Clinical …, 2008 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVES: The reporting of the search methods used in systematic reviews has
implications for how systematic reviews are critically appraised, their reproducibility and how …

Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement

S Parekh-Bhurke, CS Kwok, C Pang, L Hooper… - Journal of clinical …, 2011 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measures taken to deal with publication bias across different
categories of systematic reviews published in 2006 and to compare these with reviews …

Quality and transparency of overviews of systematic reviews

L Li, J Tian, H Tian, R Sun, Y Liu… - Journal of evidence …, 2012 - Wiley Online Library
Objective: To evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of overviews of systematic
reviews. Method: We developed an 18‐item assessment tool for overviews of systematic …

Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues

T Rader, M Mann, C Stansfield… - Research synthesis …, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
Introduction As standardized reporting requirements for systematic reviews are being
adopted more widely, review authors are under greater pressure to accurately record their …

[HTML][HTML] Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: validation showed the noninferiority of the objective approach

E Hausner, C Guddat, T Hermanns, U Lampert… - Journal of clinical …, 2015 - Elsevier
Background Different approaches can be adopted for the development of search strategies
of systematic reviews. The objective approach draws on already established text analysis …