Peer review is well established across most academic disciplines, and publishers, editors,
and researchers devote considerable resources to it. This paper uses examples from …

The fairness of scholarly peer review has been challenged by evidence of disparities in
publication outcomes based on author demographic characteristics. To assess this, we …

Enhancing NIH Grant Peer Review: A Broader Perspective: Cell Skip to Main Content
Advertisement Cell This journal offers authors two options (open access or subscription) to …

The number of women participating in clinical trials has increased during the last two
decades, but women are still underrepresented in clinical trials in general. Some of the …

Peer reviewed journals throughout the world have adopted similar review practices in an
effort to select the best among submitted manuscripts and to improve their quality before …

Purpose Manuscripts submitted to Academic Medicine (AM) undergo an internal editor
review to determine whether they will be sent for external peer review. Increasingly …

Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments,
little has been reported about the decision-making processes used by reviewers. One key …

Peer review is central to the process through which epidemiologists generate evidence to
inform public health and medical interventions. Reviewers thereby act as critical …

This article reports the results of an anonymous survey of researchers at a government
research institution concerning their perceptions about ethical problems with journal peer …

Study Design, Publication Outcome, and Funding of Research Presented at International
Congresses on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication | Global Health | JAMA | JAMA Network …