Collaboratively edited articles such as in Wikipedia suffer from well-identified problems
regarding their quality, eg, information accuracy, reputability of third-party sources …

Wikipedia has grown to be the world largest and busiest free encyclopedia, in which articles
are collaboratively written and maintained by volunteers online. Despite its success as a …

Wikipedia is a great example of large scale collaboration, where people from all over the
world together build the largest and maybe the most important human knowledge repository …

We present a novel model for classifying the quality of Wikipedia articles based on structural
properties of a network representation of the article's revision history. We create revision …

In this paper we address the challenge of assessing the quality of Wikipedia pages using
scores derived from edit contribution and contributor authoritativeness measures. The …

This work presents an evalation method of teams of authors in Wikipedia based on social
network analysis. We have created an implicit social network based on the edit history of …

In this paper, we propose a method to identify good quality Wikipedia articles by mutually
evaluating editors and texts. A major approach for assessing article quality is a text survival …

The research reported in this paper focuses on the question of why Wikipedia articles are
different in quality. Since these articles are developed in an open and social environment …

In open collaboration, knowledge is created and iteratively improved by a multitude of
editors who freely choose what should be their contributions. The quality of knowledge …

We consider the problem of automatically assessing Wikipedia article quality. We develop
several models to rank articles by using the editing relations between articles and editors …