Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews

FJ Mateen, J Oh, AI Tergas, NH Bhayani… - Clinical …, 2013 - Taylor & Francis
Background There is no consensus on whether screening titles alone or titles and abstracts
together is the preferable strategy for inclusion of articles in a systematic review. Methods …

[HTML][HTML] , abstract, and keyword searching resulted in poor recovery of articles in systematic reviews of epidemiologic practice

BBLP de Vries, M van Smeden, FR Rosendaal… - Journal of Clinical …, 2020 - Elsevier
Objective Article full texts are often inaccessible via the standard search engines of
biomedical literature, such as PubMed and Embase, which are commonly used for …

Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation

H Harrison, SJ Griffin, I Kuhn… - BMC medical research …, 2020 - Springer
Background Systematic reviews are vital to the pursuit of evidence-based medicine within
healthcare. Screening titles and abstracts (T&Ab) for inclusion in a systematic review is an …

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

S Waffenschmidt, M Knelangen, W Sieben… - BMC medical research …, 2019 - Springer
Background Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection
process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; …

[HTML][HTML] Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study

H Ewald, I Klerings, G Wagner, TL Heise… - Journal of clinical …, 2022 - Elsevier
Abstract Background and Objectives Assessing changes in coverage, recall, review,
conclusions and references not found when searching fewer databases. Methods In …

No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews

M Sampson, J McGowan, J Tetzlaff, E Cogo… - Journal of Clinical …, 2008 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVES: The reporting of the search methods used in systematic reviews has
implications for how systematic reviews are critically appraised, their reproducibility and how …

Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences

S Hopewell, I Boutron, DG Altman, P Ravaud - Journal of clinical …, 2015 - Elsevier
Objectives To evaluate the publication and quality of reporting of abstracts of systematic
reviews presented at scientific medical conferences. Study Design and Setting We included …

Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts

VM Montori, NL Wilczynski, D Morgan, RB Haynes… - BMC medicine, 2003 - Springer
Background Systematic reviews summarize all pertinent evidence on a defined health
question. They help clinical scientists to direct their research and clinicians to keep updated …

Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity

MB Elamin, DN Flynn, D Bassler, M Briel… - Journal of clinical …, 2009 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: To assist investigators planning, coordinating, and conducting systematic
reviews in the selection of data-extraction tools for conducting systematic reviews. STUDY …

Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study

K Goossen, S Hess, C Lunny, D Pieper - BMC medical research …, 2020 - Springer
Abstract Background When conducting an Overviews of Reviews on health-related topics, it
is unclear which combination of bibliographic databases authors should use for searching …