Background Funding agencies around the world show gender gaps in grant success, with women often receiving less funding than men. However, these studies have been …
Narrative reviews of peer review research have concluded that there is negligible evidence of gender bias in the awarding of grants based on peer review. Here, we report the findings …
Background Across countries and disciplines, studies show male researchers receive more research funding than their female peers. Because most studies have been observational, it …
AC Tricco, SM Thomas, J Antony, P Rios, R Robson… - PLoS …, 2017 - journals.plos.org
Objective To review the literature on strategies implemented or identified to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants. Methods Studies of any type of …
R Tamblyn, N Girard, CJ Qian, J Hanley - Cmaj, 2018 - Can Med Assoc
BACKGROUND: Peer review is used to determine what research is funded and published, yet little is known about its effectiveness, and it is suspected that there may be biases. We …
PSF Yip, Y Xiao, CLH Wong, TKF Au - Humanities and social sciences …, 2020 - nature.com
Despite growing attention to gender disparities in higher education, women in academia still receive less research funding and recognition. Previous research on this gender gap has …
Previous studies have found little or no systematic differences in the rates at which female and male scientists are awarded funding in international grant competitions. However, past …
Criteria are an essential component of any procedure for assessing merit. Yet, little is known about the criteria peers use to assess grant applications. In this systematic review we …
Background Although women at all career stages are more likely to leave academia than men, early-career women are a particularly high-risk group. Research supports that women …