[HTML][HTML] The foundation and consequences of gender bias in grant peer review processes

R Morgan, K Hawkins, J Lundine - CMAJ, 2018 - Can Med Assoc
Women are underrepresented as authors of research articles, 2 and less frequently cited
than men. 7 An observational study of collaboration on journal articles, for example, found …

[HTML][HTML] The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions

S Sato, PM Gygax, J Randall, M Schmid Mast - Higher Education, 2021 - Springer
The growing literature on gender inequality in academia attests to the challenge that awaits
female researchers during their academic careers. However, research has not yet …

[HTML][HTML] Strategies to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants: a rapid scoping review

AC Tricco, SM Thomas, J Antony, P Rios, R Robson… - PLoS …, 2017 - journals.plos.org
Objective To review the literature on strategies implemented or identified to prevent or
reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants. Methods Studies of any type of …

Gender Bias in Peer Review panels:–“The Elephant in the Room” 1

H Schiffbaenker, P van den Besselaar… - Inequalities and the …, 2022 - taylorfrancis.com
Research councils claim to select excellent grant proposals in order to advance science. At
the same time, grant success rates often differ between male and female applicants. In this …

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist

HO Witteman, M Hendricks, S Straus, C Tannenbaum - Biorxiv, 2017 - biorxiv.org
Background Funding agencies around the world show gender gaps in grant success, with
women often receiving less funding than men. However, these studies have been …

[HTML][HTML] Does gender matter in grant peer review?

R Mutz, L Bornmann, HD Daniel - Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 2015 - econtent.hogrefe.com
One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this
study we evaluated the grant peer review process (external reviewers' ratings, and board of …

[HTML][HTML] Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency

HO Witteman, M Hendricks, S Straus, C Tannenbaum - The Lancet, 2019 - thelancet.com
Background Across countries and disciplines, studies show male researchers receive more
research funding than their female peers. Because most studies have been observational, it …

[HTML][HTML] Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact?

J Johnson, Z Sharman, B Vissandjée, DE Stewart - PloS one, 2014 - journals.plos.org
We analyzed the impact of a requirement introduced in December 2010 that all applicants to
the Canadian Institutes of Health Research indicate whether their research designs …

Are female applicants disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health peer review? Combining algorithmic text mining and qualitative methods to detect evaluative …

W Magua, X Zhu, A Bhattacharya, A Filut… - Journal of women's …, 2017 - liebertpub.com
Background: Women are less successful than men in renewing R01 grants from the National
Institutes of Health. Continuing to probe text mining as a tool to identify gender bias in peer …

[HTML][HTML] Male applicants are more likely to be awarded fellowships than female applicants: A case study of a Japanese national funding agency

D Kyogoku, Y Wada - Plos one, 2023 - journals.plos.org
Scientific grant applications are subjected to scholarly peer review. Studies show that the
success rates of grant applications are often higher for male than for female applicants …