In safety-critical systems many software components of different criticalities or assurance
levels need to interact in a timely manner to keep the system and environment safe …

Real-time safety-critical systems are getting more complex by integrating multiple
applications with different criticality levels on a single platform. The increasing complexity in …

Modern real-time systems tend to be mixed-critical, in the sense that they integrate on the
same computational platform applications at different levels of criticality. Integration gives the …

A mixed-criticality system comprises safety-critical and non-safety-critical tasks sharing a
computational platform. Thus, different levels of assurance are required by different tasks in …

Thanks to Mixed-Criticality (MC) scheduling, high and low-criticality tasks can share the
same execution platform, improving considerably the usage of computation resources. Even …

Deploying safety-critical systems into constrained embedded platforms is a challenge for
developers who must arbitrate between two conflicting objectives: software has to be safe …

Mixed Criticality helps reducing the impact of pessimistic evaluation of Worst Case
Execution Time for real-time systems. This is achieved by hosting lowcriticality tasks on a …

Traditional fixed-priority scheduling analysis for periodic and sporadic task sets is based on
the assumption that all tasks are equally critical to the correct operation of the system …

Designing mixed criticality real-time systems raises numerous challenges. In particular,
reducing their energy consumption while enforcing their schedulability is yet an open …

Mixed Criticality systems require a difficult compromise to be drawn between efficient system
utilisation and sufficient separation of critical components. In addition to these challenges …